BS
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- BXSL delivered record total investment income ($353M) and solid NII ($183M; $0.84/share), while NAV/share rose for the ninth straight quarter to $27.39; asset yields fell to 10.4% from 11.2% QoQ as spreads tightened, partially offset by lower borrowing costs (5.17% vs. 5.45%) and strong deployment .
- Liquidity expanded sharply to $2.4B as management prepositioned for an “active 2025” deployment backdrop; leverage moved to 1.17x (midpoint of 1.0–1.25x target range) .
- Dividend of $0.77/share was maintained and covered at 109%; first‑lien exposure remained 98.0% with non‑accruals minimal at 0.3% of cost (0.2% of fair value), supporting durable earnings power and NAV stability .
- Liability optimization and scale are core catalysts: tightest‑spread 2024 BDC bond issues (5.35% due 2028, +$300M tap) and an inaugural $458M CLO at SOFR+154 reinforce low cost of capital and funding durability that can support origination leadership and shareholder returns .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Deployment and originations: highest fundings since 2021 ($1.377B) and $1.241B in commitments; management emphasized incumbency and platform scale to create deal flow amid slow M&A, with over half of Q4 deals proactively originated within Blackstone’s ecosystem .
- Funding and liabilities: $700M of 5.35% notes due 2028 (tightest BDC bond spread in 2024) and a $458M CLO at SOFR+154 lowered borrowing costs and extended maturities, bolstering liquidity to $2.4B .
- Credit quality: non‑accruals remained minimal (0.3% cost; 0.2% fair value), with 98% first‑lien exposure and average LTV ~46%, sustaining NAV stability and defensive positioning; management highlighted interest coverage of 1.7x and only 9% of portfolio below 1x vs. 15% market .
What Went Wrong
- Asset yields compressed: weighted average yield on performing debt fell to 10.4% from 11.2% QoQ (and 11.6% in Q2), reflecting broad market spread tightening; management expects near‑term stability, potential widening mid‑year as M&A rebounds .
- NII per share ticked down to $0.84 (from $0.91 in Q3 and $0.89 in Q2) as asset yields tightened and expenses rose with scale, though lower borrowing costs and stronger fundings offset some pressure .
- Isolated marks: Medallia marked mid‑90s due to slower growth into capital structure despite meaningful EBITDA growth; management emphasized control, documentation strength, and ecosystem cross‑sell to mitigate risk .
Financial Results
Segment/Composition (Q4 only):
Key KPIs
Guidance Changes
Management did not provide quantitative guidance on revenue/EPS, margins, OpEx, OI&E, tax rate, or segment‑specific metrics; qualitative outlook favored “active 2025” deployment .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “BXSL reported another strong quarter, highlighted by its record total investment income, increased net asset value…continued solid credit performance and active deployment.”
- “Our net investment income…represented a 12.3% annualized return on equity…made up overwhelmingly from contractual income rather than one‑time fees or dividend income.”
- “We ended the quarter with $13.1 billion of investments…adding 28 new borrowers…liquidity position to $2.4 billion…weighted average yield…10.4%.”
- “BXCI led a $2 billion debt financing for Dropbox…closed…with an implied loan‑to‑value ratio of under 30%.”
- “Total investment income…a record for the fund…up $49 million…NAV per share increased to $27.39…weighted average interest rate on our borrowings of 5.17%, down from 5.4% last quarter.”
Q&A Highlights
- Originations despite slow M&A: Over half of Q4 deals were proactive/incumbent origination, leveraging platform scale to “create deal flow when the market doesn’t provide it.”
- Middle market tilt and spreads: Median EBITDA of new investments was $138M; weighted average spread on deals funded SOFR+510 with point OID; 3‑yr implied spread ~SOFR+550; expect near‑term spread stability .
- Tariff exposure: Management estimates mid‑single digit exposure; more cautious on consumer goods; monitoring Mexico/China/Canada channels .
- Specific mark (Medallia): Mark reflects slower growth into capital structure; EBITDA has “tripled since we made the investment”; documentation/control protections emphasized .
- Competition and repayments: BSLs more active; expect repayments to rise with M&A rebound, providing upside via call protection and accelerated OID .
Guidance Changes
See table above; dividend of $0.77/share for Q1 2025 maintained; no quantitative guidance ranges provided beyond dividend cadence .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus estimates for quarterly EPS and revenue were not retrievable in this session due to provider limit constraints; thus, we cannot assess beat/miss vs. consensus in Q4 2024 at this time [Values retrieved from S&P Global unavailable due to limit].
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Earnings power remained robust and durable: record total investment income, strong NII, and ninth consecutive NAV/share increase underscore disciplined underwriting and portfolio defensiveness .
- Yield compression is real but manageable: asset yields tightened to 10.4%; liability cost fell to 5.17% with tight spreads on bonds/CLOs, preserving net interest while deployment ramps .
- Defensive credit posture persists: 98% first‑lien, ~46% LTV, minimal non‑accruals, and superior interest coverage vs. market mitigate downside risk and support dividend coverage (109%) .
- Scale and origination edge: liquidity at $2.4B and platform incumbency enable BXSL to originate in slow M&A environments and position for an “active 2025” deployment pipeline .
- Funding tailwinds and ratings: Baa2 (Moody’s) and BBB/Stable (Fitch) complement tight funding spreads; no maturities until 2026 provide runway to compound NAV and earnings .
- Watch list: spreads vs. risk (focus on LTV and recurring revenue), tariff sensitivity in select sectors, and asset‑level marks (e.g., Medallia) as performance normalizes in a tighter spread regime .
- Trading implications: sustained dividend coverage and improving liability costs are supportive, while near‑term valuation sensitivity may track spread dynamics and evidence of M&A‑driven repayments/fee accruals in 1H–2H 2025 .